EveryTeacher Logo

Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant
Year 4 Action Step #8
SPA Assessment Training Activity
July 25-27, 2006
Dakota Wesleyan University - Mitchell, SD

Participant Feedback Form

Part I.

Last Name: First Name:
Institution/Agency: Position/Teaching Area:

Session(s) Attended: (check any/all for which you provide feedback)
  Tuesday AM, July 25 - Institutional Orientation/Compiler Training (Margie Crutchfield)
  Tuesday PM, July 25 - ELCC SPA Reviewer Training
  Tuesday PM, July 25 - AAHPERD/NASPE SPA Reviewer Training
  Tuesday PM, July 25 - CEC SPA Reviewer Training
 
  Wednesday AM, July 26 - Institutional Orientation/Compiler Training (Margie Crutchfield)
  Wednesday PM, July 26 - NCTM SPA Reviewer Training
 
  Thursday AM, July 27 - Institutional Orientation/Compiler Training (Pami Hagen and Lynda Oldenkamp)
  Thursday PM, July 27 - NSTA SPA Reviewer Training
  Thursday PM, July 27 - NCSS SPA Reviewer Training

Part II.

What if anything about the following sections of the NCATE/SPA Program Reports and Program Review Process should be modified for the South Dakota Program Reports and Program Review Process?

Section I: Contextual Information
A. Comments from Institutional Orientation/compiler training:
B. Comments from SPA specific reviewer training:
 
Section II: Assessment Chart
A. Comments from Institutional Orientation/compiler training:
B. Comments from SPA specific reviewer training:
 
Section III: Standards Chart
A. Comments from Institutional Orientation/compiler training:
B. Comments from SPA specific reviewer training:
 
Section IV: Evidence of Meeting Standards
A. Comments from Institutional Orientation/compiler training:
B. Comments from SPA specific reviewer training:
 
Section V: Use of Assessment Results to Improve Performance
A. Comments from Institutional Orientation/compiler training:
B. Comments from SPA specific reviewer training:

Part III.

Please provide comments about how you think the following aspects of the NCATE/SPA Program Review Process may need to be modified/adapted for the South Dakota Program Review Process.

1. Program Reviewer Selection, Roles and Obligations:
2. SD Management of Program Review Process (if not seeking national recognition)- electronic submission, timelines/deadlines, how much data required, "recognition" report and use at onsite unit review, etc.:
3. Program Review Decisions:

Part IV.

  Other/General Comments on Training Sessions